State v. D.F.
State v. D.F. (06/05/2013) Defendant charged with DWI (N.J.S.A 39:4-50) and unsafe lane change (N.J.S.A 39:4-88B), failure to keep right (N.J.S.A 39:4-82) and maintenance of lamps (N.J.S.A 39:3-66). The defendant submitted to the Alcotest breathalyzer that resulted in a BAC level of .15% The defendant hired an expert to refute the reading but the expert indicated he was unable to find any errors in defendants processing and/or in the administration of the Alcotest and/or in the substantiating documents on the particular Alcotest device. Notwithstanding, I was able to have the breath test result of .15% suppressed saving the defendant from additional license suspension, added fines, and preventing the mandatory installation of the interlock device.